Hanging Out With Humanists May 2025

We had at least two newcomers! And a chicken joined us in the afternoon before evening fell.

Libertarian paternalism. Heard of that phrase before? Not many had, until this Hanging Out with Humanists (HOH) session at Hans Union@Springleaf. Topics pertaining to leadership, human agency and the many forms of ethics were discussed, such as the sources and/or methods from whence morality and ethics are derived, and how that scales up to affect politics and governance. Furthermore, topics such as Singaporean education were touched upon, such as the realities behind academic certifications and alternatives, and how Singapore compares in terms of flexibility in life direction against other metropolitan countries.

Another topic of consideration was how everyone has their own styles when it comes to communicating with others. However, regardless of whether one is an extrovert – willing to push past their comfort zones to meet new people, or an introvert – content with working within a tight knit community, work has to be done to keep those connections solid, and within the framework of Humanism, a sincere effort to work toward a common goal has to be made, lest time be wasted on being aimless and milling around. Real change does take some elbow grease, and without proactive efforts to take initiative or build relationships, all this community would amount to would be an ebbing and flowing tide of fleeting observers.

Ultimately, across the landscape of discourse from the social to the historical and intellectual, this HOH session was a walk down memory lane as to how Singaporean society, in light of its internal workings, affairs and history, has become the community it is now — and what we make of it, and how we effect change is up to us putting in a collective effort. A collective effort which — as the HSS — we can put in, if we take the time to connect with a fellow Humanist, and work with them toward a common goal.

Hanging out With Humanists [ 4th April 2025 ]

The April Hanging Out with Humanists session was nothing short of meaningful. As conversations flowed across the table, what emerged was more than just dialogue—it was a shared moment of reflection, openness, and connection.

On Religion as Story and Culture

Yew Hwee Ong shared a deeply thought-provoking perspective that emerged right at the end of the evening. While firmly identifying as an atheist and secular humanist, he expressed a new appreciation for the influence religion holds—not as truth, but as a powerful narrative form deeply embedded in culture.

“To me, religion should be seen like fiction—much like One Piece, Attack on Titan, Lord of the Rings, or Harry Potter,” he said. “These stories, while fictional, offer guidance, inspiration, and commentary on real life. Rituals, then, become simulations of those stories—like walking through a living museum of mythology.”

He acknowledged the undeniable impact of religion on human behavior and the structures of society—both positive and oppressive. The key difference, he noted, is that religious believers equate their stories with reality, while secular humanists treat them as cultural narratives that still deserve thoughtful engagement.

On Morality, Disagreement, and Mutual Respect

Melvin added that the evening was lively, especially with the presence of three newcomers who each brought unique perspectives. He mentioned the “merry, respectful disagreements” with Yew Hwee, especially around how we define and measure morality.

In response, Yew Hwee reflected with sincerity:

“I truly respect your points. They made me think seriously about how we can make better decisions by balancing morality, utility, and the well-being of people in different contexts.”

It was a beautiful example of how disagreement, when held with respect, can deepen understanding rather than divide.

On Connection, Care, and Reaching Out

Meanwhile, on the other side of the table, Lava shared insights into the emotional and social outreach strategies of religious institutions. He pointed out how adept these institutions are at making people feel seen—stepping out of their own spaces to meet others where they are, and building genuine human connection.

“We talked about how religious institutions blur the lines between secular and sacred, reaching into marketplaces and even influencing the upper echelons of society. There’s a lesson here for us: we, too, need to step out of our comfort zones.”

Lava emphasized the importance of noticing members of our own society who may be silently struggling. A simple check-in message or an open ear can mean the world. He reminded us that:

“Sometimes the conversation becomes more important than the person—but it shouldn’t be. The person should always come first.”

What made the evening truly special, he reflected, was how personal the conversation felt. “I got to know some of our members more deeply than I ever have since joining,” he said.

A Night of Thoughtful Connection

The HOH reminded us of what makes humanist spaces meaningful: not just the sharing of ideas, but the care and curiosity we extend toward one another. Whether through challenging perspectives, respectful disagreement, or heartfelt conversation, we continue to learn not just how to think—but how to be human, together.

Hanging out with Humanists: Darwin, Dawkins, and a Dash of Lo Hei!

Friday 7th February Hanging Out with Humanists was a lively mix of new faces, deep discussions, and delicious traditions! We welcomed three new guests into our ever-growing circle, and since it’s Darwin Month, it was only fitting that we engaged in some evolutionary discourse… and a bit of natural selection in conversation too!

The heated debate of the night? Natural selection and gender identification! Darwin might not have envisioned this particular topic when writing The Origin of Species, but if he were at our table, he’d probably have furiously taken notes (or quietly excused himself).

To keep things fun, we played “Who Said It: Darwin or Dawkins?”, where quick-thinking participants had to guess whether a quote came from the father of evolution or the father of sharp-tongued atheism. Correct answers were rewarded with special gifts—though, unfortunately, we couldn’t offer survival of the fittest as a prize.

Of course, no gathering is complete without touching on world affairs—we also discussed the growing concerns over Muslim refugees in Europe, US politics on illegal immigration, and perhaps the most pressing issue of the night: Why can’t we get REAL pork bacon in Singapore’s McDonald’s?! (A moment of silence for this injustice.)

And since it’s still Chinese Lunar New Year, we ended the night with a spirited Lo Hei session—because nothing screams humanist camaraderie like tossing food in the air and shouting wishes for luck, health, and maybe even a future where SG McDonald’s serves pork bacon.

As always, it was an evening filled with laughter, deep discussions, and a good dose of chaos—just the way we like it! Until next time, stay curious, stay skeptical, and may the best adaptations win!