(Spoilers Alert)
「 Dear Tenant 」is a social-awakening movie, about Taiwan’s, and perhaps Asia’s societal mistreatment of gay males. The story revolves around the protagonist Jianyi, a gay person, who lives under the tenancy of his male partner/lover’s mother (Grandma Wang) who knows of the relationship. Jianyi cares for the partner’s nine-year-old son Wang Youyu from the previous (heterosexual) marriage, and for landlord Grandma Wang, who suffers from septic diabetes.
[Read more…]The Covid-19 pandemic has forced many couples to adjust their wedding plans. Our Humanist Celebrant, Mr Tan Tatt Si, shares some moments from a Humanist wedding in Singapore.
[Read more…]Seven years is a long time, as long as three of the four MNCs I used to work for in my 26 year career before HSS. I see things like Darwin sees evolution, something that volunteers with a couple of years at a stretch do not and cannot see.
[Read more…]Like people with religion, humanists go through the trials and tribulations of life. We laugh together, we cry together, and mostly revel at the precious time, in the one life we have. To be able to share these moments with our loved ones, through rituals, is second nature – it’s human nature.
Humanists celebrate birth, baby naming, confirmation, marriage, god parenting, vow renewals, and death. Yes, death, for the life well lived.
The following are some of the past humanist celebrant-led ceremonies :
____________________________________________________________________________
(15th Feb 2020) Nanthini (Singaporean) and Rangarajan (UK) were married by JP PY Tan, and ritually by Tan Tatt Si, on 15 Feb 2020. Their photos will be uploaded only after 24 May, when they’ve had their traditional wedding ceremonies in Chennai.
(19th Jan 2020) What would a five year-old sister, and a one year-old brother, have in common besides their families and village of friends ? That both Lily & Theo had names for a while, and yet a Baby Naming ceremony was still relevant for them, and for today’s society.
(3rd Jan 2020) Chiara (Italy) & Andrew (Australia) flew to each others’ continents , met at a work meeting in Melbourne six years ago, and decided to marry on Sentosa, Singapore. Together, they have a ‘son’ – a rabbit called ciaro – who joined them in their family unit.
(10th July 2019) Sandy (Singapore) & Nick (UK) tied the knot after the Raffles Hotel reopening. Nick’s 30yo son – Sonny – welcomes Sandy to the family, and shows that love does not count the years or number of times.
(9th June 2019) Alicia (Singapore) & Ryan (UK) got hitched at Labrador Park. The most memorable parts are how different cultures have very similar ritual manifestations : the Quaich two-handled cup of welcome, and the Chinese tea ceremony.
(30th Mar 2019) Aparna (Singaporean) & Darroch (UK, Ireland) , in Sofitel Sentosa. This was the first joint Solemniser/Celebrant ceremony.
(Sept 2018) Narumon (Thailand) & Peter (Singapore) got married on the evening seaside of Changi, witnessed by many friends who flew in from Thailand. They chose handfasting , to depict tying the knot, to seal their new relationship.
(11th Nov 2017) Carissa (Singapore) & Brad (Australia) got married in Swiss Club.
(20th Sept 2016) Bev (UK) & Richard (UK) had their families flown in from UK and Australia, for their wedding rituals here (to coincide with F1 race), before both moving to Australia to start a family. The happy couple, today, has a son – Harry (below).
(28th Aug 2016) Andrew & Cameron (Australians), wanted their baby Julian to have godparents, a practice common in many societies. They got a better deal – the whole village showed up.
Based on the series of photographs taken by TattSi (the Society’s current president), the A5-size desktop calendars will be sold at S$30 each, 50% going to Limitless- ZDKF, and 50% to HSS, to help both organizations do good for the community. For Singapore mail orders , there will be a surcharge of $2.50, to cover stationeries , postage and logistics.
How to buy :
(1) Pay to our UOB A/C# 373-302-759-0 , or through PayPal to info@humanist.org.sg
(2) Send an email to services@humanist.org.sg , to inform us of the payment and the way to receive your calendar.
(3) You can also specify if you want the photographer to autograph on it.
Limitless (UEN 201713769M) is a non-profit organisation that helps youths build hope, find worth, and live destiny-driven lives. Through Limitless, the Zen Dylan Koh Fund (ZDKF) was set up to help at-risk youths deal with poverty, mental illness, social inequality and bullying.
Get your 20|20 VISION Calendar now, and begin to help youths who need support !
(20|20 VISION is a personal project, not an HSS merchandise, but benefits both HSS & Limitless-ZDKF)
(This open letter was published on 29th September 2019, on HSS Facebook page)
Thanking mothership.sg for its article on Closeted Ex-Muslims
The Humanist Society Singapore (HSS) would like to thank mothership.sg. for bringing up the plight of the invisible class of religious refugees in Singapore, in its 22nd September 2019 online article <Despite rising numbers of atheistic Singaporeans, this ex-Muslim remains closeted >.
[Read more…](Narration done by Ms Shamima Rafi.)
It is not easy being a girl. It doesn’t get easier when we are called a woman in our later years. As one of 4 daughters, I’ve heard people telling my parents how unlucky they are to be burdened with so many daughters. That they should keep trying till they get a son. Because a son will take care of the family. What can daughters do? They will get married and become their husband’s property. They can’t support you in your old age. You can’t depend on them.
Well my parents got divorced. Guess who started supporting the family?
As we girls get older and at different stages of our lives – we get questioned. Interrogated even. So when are you planning to get married? Why do you need to study so much/high for? Just settle down and get married. You can’t keep delaying your marriage. It’s a sin. God doesn’t like it.
And then we get married and now we are barged with when we will have kids. For a lot of women, the society they live and grew up in, has decided that a woman’s place is at home where she cleans the house and takes care of her children. And God forbids if she is a working mum and her marriage is failing or her kids are not doing well in school because she will be blamed.
If she stayed at home none of this would have happened.
If she took care of herself and did not gain so much weight maybe she could have saved her marriage.
If she had another kid instead of stopping at one maybe, maybe, maybe.
And even if you decide to be independent and build something for the community, people will still question you. Your motives. Your intention. When I started my organisations, – you’d think people would be happy to support and join you. Nope. They would rather stand outside where they can see you and wait for you to fall. Hard.
Funny you think we don’t know. Well we see you. Bright and clear.
It’s a “dog eat dog world.”
But for the longest time since we can remember, it has been “tear the woman to shreds world.”
Tear her from her dreams, her wants, her needs.
Tear her from her self even.
From misusing religion, to the media, to society, to structures and policies and laws, – we enforce impossible expectations for our women.
We tell them they wear too little. We tell them they wear too much.
We tell them what to wear. What not to wear.
We tell them they speak too much. We tell them we can’t hear their voice.
We tell them they don’t have dreams. We punish them for dreaming.
And sometimes we women hurt our own.
We see our sisters out there and up there and we wish otherwise for them.
We put down our sisters when when they make choices for their lives that we don’t agree with.
You know exactly what I am talking about.
We need to support our women. All of them. Our wives. Our mothers. Our sisters. Our daughters.
And it starts from celebrating them at birth itself. And as they become girls with hopes and dreams.
Empower them. Love them. Support them.
And my sisters out there- keep at it.
Your strength, your voice and your soul nourishes whether or not you believe that.
Ironically, it is what confuses and scares people too.
“Why is she so strong? Where did she get it from?”
But our Mothers have fought a long way for us and we gotta keep fighting the good fight.
And hopefully one day all our daughters will live in the world we fought hard for.
Siti Noor Mastura. Permission was granted to use this piece, which was from the 2014 International Day of the Girl.
(Also available at medium.com.)
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. I am delighted to be here today with you.
In honour of this conference being about humans, could I invite you to take a mental pause with three deep breaths? (Breathe) Did you know that only humans can breathe by volition but we don’t do enough of that. Thank you for your trust and indulgence.
I must admit that it took me a while to say yes to Tatt Si’s invitation because I’m not entirely sure where and if I can add value! Belief is not an easy concept to define. As it is said, “everyone knows what belief is until you ask them to define it.” But the general agreement is this: that ‘belief’ is how we see the world and how we act on it. Beliefs can be as uneventful as “I believe it will rain today”, to “I believe the Earth is flat”, to even more life-altering like “I believe in God.” It forms the perception we have of reality, determining how we see the world. After all, we see the world not as it is, but as we are. “As we are” is determined by our history, our influences, our experiences.
Our beliefs are our assessments, not assertions or facts. Let me illustrate with a simple example. I live in a charming HDB flat in Marine Crescent with a seaview which I affectionately call The Bliss Loft. As long as you have a tape measure, you will arrive at the same conclusion that my flat has an area of 76sqm. So “my flat is 76sqm” is an assertion. Many guests to my place have commented that “your place is so spacious” whilst a few others may say “your place is so cosy” and sometimes followed by “are you planning to upgrade?”. Same 76 sqm of space but different assessments because of different beliefs and values.
For the sake of convenience, I will use the terms “values” and “belief” interchangeably. After all, while beliefs are assumptions that we make about the world, our values stem from these beliefs and so both terms are inherently connected.
The Asia Pacific Values Survey published in 2014, which also involved 1000 citizens Singapore, asked over 50 questions that make us pause and access that deep hidden part of the proverbial iceberg that shapes our attitudes, our behaviours, our lives.
One such question was “If you had to choose one, would you rather have more money or more free time? Take a moment to reflect. Your answer to this question could provide some reference to how you structure your life and you make choices based on what you believe in. You might not be surprised to know that 48% chose money and the rest chose free time.
Let’s try another. “If you could be born again, would you like to be a boy or a girl?”. Your answer could reflect the pressure, and the importance we give to the traditional Asian ‘obsession’ with having a boy. This hits deep home and hard for me. I was born into a family of this belief, in a different time a different Singapore perhaps. With that belief, I was also made to carry a birth name 婷 which means ‘stop’ to put a brake on the female streak for the next offspring. And I carried. not surprisingly, an inherited and imposed belief that took me a long time to shed: the belief that being a woman is less, and therefore I was less.
Values define the norms of a social system, while clashes between alternative values create basis for conflicts and divisions.
Do you wake up some days and feel like we are living through an acute period of clash between beliefs? A clash of civilisations, a clash between rich and poor, a clash between young and old, between one class and another, between one religion and another. I do. Increasing disruptions we see in political systems around the world, the emergence of populism, hate speech, extreme views. Compared to a generation or two ago (and I am qualified as a quinquagenarian to say this), societies are now displaying major changes in social norms: hierarchical relationships are giving way to self-expression, regard to authority giving way to decentralisation. New beliefs and values are emerging, affecting attitudes toward work, lifestyles and our roles as individuals in society.
This shift is not our imagination. The World Values Survey has been tracking such shifts of the world from 1981–2015. Political scientists working on this project assert that there are two major dimensions of cross cultural variation in the world: Traditional values (like religion, deference to authority) versus Secular-rational values (opposite preferences to traditional values), Survival values (economic and physical security) versus Self-expression values.
Decades ago, economic growth, security and defense were high on our priority list. But as quality of life improved, we give our attention and interest to new issues like protecting the environment, free speech and protecting minorities, whether it be in terms of gender, race or sexual orientation as well as rising demands for participation in decision making in political and economic life.
Today, our voice is not only heard in physical spaces, but rings out also in virtual spaces. At the beginning of the Internet era, we marveled at the fact that information and people could be brought together so easily. We had expected a global society, citizens connected to one another across the globe. The paradox, however, is in the fact that in trying to create a more accepting society based on a plurality of views, we have become even more hostile towards each other, choosing to surround ourselves with people who have similar views.
In 2017, Facebook counted 2 billion members globally. In the same year, 48% of Americans stated that they relied primarily on Facebook for news. I won’t be surprised if this number is representative for the rest of the world.
Where traditional newspapers could only target broad demographic groups based on language, location, education level, Facebook further tailors content thanks to your likes, posts and comments. Your feed is curated by an algorithm to maximise engagement, and has become a place where civic discourse and political engagement happens, all the while in an increasingly narrow option of views.
Yet, isn’t it in the values of democracy that people should be exposed to a plurality of ideas? When we lose this plurality, society becomes made up of extremes, confined in echo chambers, interacting only with people who believe the same things. We become insulated from opposing points of view, forming virtual cliques and communities that serve only to reinforce biases.
It used to be that the only way to communicate was face-to-face. If you met someone who disagreed with you, you were still able to see the body-language, and micro-expressions. You would see the human side of the disagreement. The nuances of beliefs are lost in the screen and in the words we read. We tend to assume the worst of people, turning them into stereotypes and putting them all into a single box.
And while it’s easy to blame it on the algorithm, research suggests that we, in fact, play the lead role in driving our own polarisation. Confirmation bias states our tendency to believe evidence that supports our pre-existing beliefs. And this bias could be so strong that people would refuse to even consider the possibility that they could have been mistaken. If you believe that the world is flat, then you would seek out evidence to support that, like the thousands of members of the Flat Earth Society do. For example, the solar eclipse of 21 August 2017 gave rise to numerous YouTube videos purporting to show how the details of the eclipse prove the Earth is flat.
Being tribal is very primal, we gravitate towards people who look like us and think like us. Being tribal satisfies our need to find comfort and a sense of belonging among our own. It is the way we have learned to survive from the times of the first hunter-gatherers. Tribalism helps us identify who is like us, and who is different, allowing us to notice potential threats.
But when taken to the extreme, tribalism becomes an “us versus them” battle. Tribes demand loyalty and in return give us the security of belonging. Tribal loyalty is what caused close to a million deaths in only a few months in Rwanda in the 1990s; it is what is turning Aung San Suu Kyi, a winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, to be accused of being an enabler of ethnic cleansing in Myanmar. It is what populist leaders latch onto when rallying the majority to overturn the status quo.
But what we find at the root of tribalism is in fact a fear of the “other”. Cultural neuroscience has even shown that at an unconscious level, our brains respond differently to the view of faces from different races or cultures. If we were only exposed to people who look like us, if we only listen to one media outlet and remained with like-minded people, the inherent fear and hatred toward unseen people would be an understandable but deeply flawed consequence of this.
Beyond fear, it is perhaps something else, more approachable: that of not understanding. What we do not understand, we fear. What we fear, we think is a threat to our survival. And what is a threat to our survival, we attempt to control. What we cannot control, we attack.
Take the crisis with the Rohingyas, for example — that’s right in our own backyard. With a 4% Muslim population in Myanmar, the Rohingyas are not recognised by the government of Myanmar and are therefore stateless even if they have lived in the Rakhine state for centuries. These ethnic and religious tensions fuel violence against this community, seen by the Buddhist majority as a foreign group with a separatist agenda and fueled by the religion of Islam. What we humanitarian groups and other nations see, on the other hand, is a persecuted minority. Since 2017, more than 700,000 Rohingya Muslims have been expelled from Myanmar, in a murderous campaign that some United Nations officials say may constitute genocide. They fled to Bangladesh and neighbouring countries like Indonesia and Malaysia.
The non-interference policy of ASEAN, however impedes regional countries from getting involved in the internal affairs of Myanmar, prioritising instead moral suasion, quiet diplomacy and discussion. But is this sufficient? Nelson Mandela once said “to deny people their human rights is to challenge their very humanity”. I’ve been raising this issue with our Minister for Foreign Affairs in Parliament, perhaps a tad too many times and will be asking for an update on the recent ASEAN Summit at the Parliament sitting on Monday .
The Rohingya crisis is close to my heart. I visited the refugee camp in Cox’s Bazar last year which shelters one million Rohingyas. 65% of them are children, many traumatised while being denied formal education. One of my community projects, Playground of Joy, is currently exploring opportunities with an NGO in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh to bring psychosocial support programmes to Rohingya refugee children and women. We are starting our values-based and wellbeing programme to another NGO-run learning centre for Rohingya children in Johor Bahru this September, which I visited in April. The net proceeds from my book are also going towards supporting psychosocial support programmes for the children.
What are we if we turn our backs to those suffering? How can we justify multiculturalism and plurality if it does not include the minorities? Majoritarian thinking for social cohesion is unrealistic as one can never truly be in the majority across all spheres of life. More importantly, being in the majority represents an unequivocal privilege, which calls us to reach out and protect the minorities. It would not do either to focus merely on what happens within our national boundaries.
How can we transcend our beliefs and faiths? What binds us?
In 2017, religious world leaders came together to make an impassioned and united call to the G7 leaders to take action to protect our beautiful blue planet. They found within their beliefs a common denominator:
The Climate Crisis is perhaps the biggest crisis in the history of humanity because let’s get real, it’s not the planet we are saving because she will regenerate and come back stronger as she’s been in the last 4.5 billion years. It’s us humans that we are saving if we can reverse our climate change trends. Could this crisis be what we need to finally get us to acknowledge and affirm that which binds us all? That we are first and foremost humans.
Desmond Tutu famously said “my humanity is bound up in yours, for we can only be human together.” And how easy it is to forget that. Let’s give ourselves an opportunity to be reminded of our humanness, to be brave and vulnerable with this social experiment. Please raise your hand if you identify with some of the questions that I’m going to ask. (Some of them might be personal):
Were you surprised to see some people raise their hands with you for the same question? What did you learn from this exercise? What thoughts and emotions are you holding now?
I remember a quote somewhere that says: “Only the small of heart think: “These are my people, and those strangers.” For the magnanimous sage, All the world is family.” When we focus on what unites us rather than what divides us, we stand in our common humanity. We remember what makes us human.
Which, to me, is Compassion and Love because “In every age and dispensation, all Divine Ordinances are changed and transformed according to the requirements of time, except the law of Love.” Indeed, Love is timeless, universal and life-giving.
And Love was what I lost and found when I was left with all but $16 in the bank, along with a broken heart and a broken business, 12 years ago. Love failed me through different seasons of my life — from being born with an eye defect, being ‘unwanted’ as a girl to being cheated on and later sued by my own husband. Yet it is also the love that came in many shades and shapes including the unyielding support of my family and friends, and the generosity of strangers that lifted me every time I fell. All I understand and everything I know, I know because I love. So I decided to write 50 Shades of Love last year as a celebration of my 50 colourful years of walking on this earth as a human. I’m grateful to Tatt Si for allowing me to bring 20 signed copies of my book today. Thank you, you will be giving love to the Rohingya children with your support.
And thank you for listening and participating. With the ease with which fake news and hate speech travels online and social media becoming echo chambers where only like-minded views are filtered out for us, it is increasingly important for us to actively seek out the other points of view. Trust has to be forged face to face, one encounter at a time. So I encourage you to listen with curiosity and compassion. Because being human is a given, but keeping our humanity is a choice.
It’s why I choose to be a full time human being, and part-time everything else. And why I would still choose to be a girl if I could be born again. For my religion, my belief, my faith is Love. Love for the human that I am, for the humanity in others that I’m here to serve and for this planet that I’m here to honour and protect.
In conclusion, please indulge me one last time with this poignant poem called Only Breath by the Sufi poet, Rumi that I would like to share.
Not Christian or Jew or Muslim, not Hindu
Buddhist, Sufi, or Zen. Not any religion
or cultural system. I am not from the East
or the West, not out of the ocean or up
from the ground, not natural or ethereal, not
composed of elements at all. I do not exist,
am not an entity in this world or in the next,
did not descend from Adam and Eve or any
origin story. My place is placeless, a trace
of the traceless. Neither body or soul.
I belong to the beloved, have seen the two
worlds as one and that one call to and know,
first, last, outer, inner, only that
breath breathing human being.
Thank you. May you be well, and peaceful.
Anthea Indira Ong is a Nominated Member of Parliament. (A Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP) is a Member of the Parliament of Singapore who is appointed by the President. They are not affiliated to any political party and do not represent any constituency. There are currently nine NMPs in Parliament.)
The multi-sector perspective that comes from her ground immersion of 12 years in different capacities helps her translate single-sector issues and ideas across boundaries without alienating any particular community/group. As an entrepreneur and with many years in business leadership, it is innate in her to discuss social issues with the intent of finding solutions, or at least of exploring possibilities. She champions mental health, diversity and inclusion — and volunteerism in Parliament.
She is also an impact entrepreneur/investor and a passionate mental health advocate, especially in workplace wellbeing. She started WorkWell Leaders Workgroup in May 2018 to bring together top leaders (CXOs, Heads of HR/CSR/D&I) of top employers in Singapore (both public and private) to share, discuss and co-create inclusive practices to promote workplace wellbeing. Anthea is also the founder of Hush TeaBar, Singapore’s 1st silent teabar and a social movement that aims to bring silence, self care and social inclusion into every workplace, every community — with a cup of tea. The Hush Experience is completely led by lovingly-trained Deaf facilitators, supported by a team of Persons with Mental Health Issues (PMHIs).
Visit her personal website here.
Good morning, and welcome.
For those who hail from Singapore, welcome to this Humanist Society (Singapore) event. And for those who come from around the region, welcome to the land that wishes to be the best in many things.
Singapore wants to have the busiest port, best airport, best airline, best passport in the world, freest economy, highest per capita GDP, best financial centre, be the #1 least corrupt country, and the cleanest country. And there are those who know the policy surrounding that — you litter, we fine you $500.
We laugh at ourselves. We laugh with ourselves. A confident country acts this way.
Another thing that we also claim to be, is to be the most religiously diverse country in the world. We do not have one dominant religion, and adherence of all beliefs live alongside each other. The balance is a delicate one. It takes looking at the region, to know how delicate it is.
(Presentation of humanism at work in India, Philippines, Malaysia, and Taiwan.)
In Singapore, the Humanist Society (Singapore) was formed in 2010 against the backdrop of a religious group taking over a women’s organisation to exert policy influence on the country.
We did not make this journey alone. Our Asian allies here continue to teach us how to move forward in a world that has a religious majority. In our hearts, humanists think that an unalienable right is the right to freedom of religion. We also believe the core that fuels freedom of religion is the freedom from religion. If one takes a moment to pause before considering which religion to choose, one needs a no-mans-land that is most suitably defined as having the freedom from religion. Without this, switching of religions will not be possible.
But in a religiously diverse landscape, how is it that we begin to choose peace over conflict? Peace begins with peace with oneself. If you cannot be at peace with yourself, how can you be at peace with others? Once we have achieved that, we can then start looking out, and we seek to understand the next person, and the next person, and the next, and so on.
InterFaith, or InterBelief, and even the bigger concept of Inter-worldview is such an important work in today’s diverse society, it should not be left to governments to do it alone.
If common space is what we seek, commonality is where we start to find it.
For instance, many religions will agree that a good society is defined by how it treats its weakest and its smallest. Many have said this in one form or another, just as many holy scriptures have emphasised helping people in need, the downtrodden. That one aspect where we start finding common ground. And that’s where true understanding and friendship can begin. Understanding and friendship with the next person, and the next person, and the next, and so on.
We often say: friends are friends without conditions. So, what is a religion, or a god, between friends?
Tan Tatt Si, President of the Humanist Society (Singapore)
After a gap of four years, the annual Asian Humanism Conference returned to Singapore in 2019. Whereas previous conferences focused on humanism, on the public day of this year’s conference, 6 July 2019, the exploration of relations between communities with different belief systems took a central role.
[Read more…]
